
Psystar vs. Apple
August 1, 2008A couple weeks ago I wrote about Psystar, the company responsible for creating Mac Clones and selling them despite direct violation of Apple’s EULA. Upping the ante, they have now hired a law firm known as Carr & Ferrell who has fought Apple in court in the past – and won. Carr & Ferrell represented Burst.com Inc. in a 2006 patent-infringement case in which Apple agreed to pay Burst.com $10 million; Burst.com Inc. has also taken on Microsoft as well, ending a similar case with $60 million. As you can see, Apple’s got a tough case on its hands now, and Psystar still has a
fighting chance. However, the stakes are high for both sides ; if Apple wins, Psystar will likely go bankrupt and be forced to recall all their OpenComputers sold so far; if Psystar wins, it will create an opportunity for other companies like Psystar to start selling their own Mac clones, which Apple will have to compete against. Methought Psystar had called it quits, but this is turning out to be an interesting situation.

Wow. I should go down to Psystar HQ and give the guy a pat on his back and invite him out for dinner. This company is my 2nd favorite after AMD. If he manages to fucking compete with Apple, I am going to Laugh the Hell OUT LOUD.!!!! Apple at the moment have no real competition bc of their OSX. Now if this guy wins…it could get reeeallll interesting for Apple.
oh yeah, I’m looking forward to that too. Psystar > Apple.
i may not agree with gentek on the arguement of intel vs amd; but this is some very interesting news for those against apple.
btw check out the voodoo envy. thinner then the macbook air with from what i can tell 3x as many features.
what was apple thinking with a one usb notebook