jump to navigation

Psystar vs. Apple August 1, 2008

Posted by t045t3d in Technology.
Tags: , , , , ,
3 comments

A couple weeks ago I wrote about Psystar, the company responsible for creating Mac Clones and selling them despite direct violation of Apple’s EULA. Upping the ante, they have now hired a law firm known as Carr & Ferrell who has fought Apple in court in the past – and won. Carr & Ferrell represented Burst.com Inc. in a 2006 patent-infringement case in which Apple agreed to pay Burst.com $10 million; Burst.com Inc. has also taken on Microsoft as well, ending a similar case with $60 million. As you can see, Apple’s got a tough case on its hands now, and Psystar still has a fighting chance. However, the stakes are high for both sides ; if Apple wins, Psystar will likely go bankrupt and be forced to recall all their OpenComputers sold so far; if Psystar wins, it will create an opportunity for other companies like Psystar to start selling their own Mac clones, which Apple will have to compete against. Methought Psystar had called it quits, but this is turning out to be an interesting situation.

Psystar Pwned by Apple July 20, 2008

Posted by t045t3d in Technology.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

The Florida-based company Psystar challenged the might of Apple back in April by offering “Mac Clones” (as well as some “Clone” Mac servers), which were basically custom-built PCs preloaded with Mac OS X. Despite being in direct violation of Apple’s End User License Agreement, the company went forward with its operations; Psystar was even willing to face Apple in court if necessary, stating that Apple’s terms themselves are a violation of US monopoly laws. Their $399 basic Open Computer consists of a 2.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, integrated Intel GMA 950 Graphics, 2GB of DDR2 memory,  250GB 7200RPM drive, four USB ports and a 20x DVD+/-R Drive – Leopard will cost an additional $155. Authentic Macs are easily twice the price so this was quite appealing to customers as a much more cost-effective way to own a Mac. Unsurprisingly, Apple has sued Psystar last week for copyright infringement, and violation of Apple’s licenses and trademarks as well as demanding a recall of all Open Computers sold. While I agree that Apple’s way of restricting their OS to Macs is a little unfair, it would be stupid for anyone, much less a company, to directly violate their EULA – especially with a ‘bring-it-on’ attitude. I respect their efforts (take that, Apple!), but Psystar was digging its own grave right from beginning.

As of date, the Psystar headquarters has gone up for sale, while the company has remained tight-lipped about the whole situation.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.